š Share this article Moscow Demands Staggering Sum in Compensation from Euroclear over Frozen Funds Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This action represents a clear warning from the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine. The Legal Claim According to accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim. EU leaders are set to decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately ā¬210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and financial stability. The vast majority of these assets, totaling ā¬185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth. Divergent Legal Views EU officials have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of reciprocal actions, such as seizing EU corporate holdings within Russia. The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal. Wider Implications With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States." Euroclear refused to comment on the latest lawsuit. It has previously stated it is facing over 100 legal cases in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead While judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer ties to the Kremlin. "The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm. European Safeguards European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first ā¬90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain untouched. Ukraine would solely be required to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the ongoing war. Alternative Proposals The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget. This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection. Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear message that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."